My comment to A M Ubaidah's blog concerning the implications of the Commission's Report on the Lingam Video Tapes is set out below.
Don’t worry brother, the fight for truth is just brewing up; kita baru nak tunjuk langkah main seni silat tempur, belum lagi silat olahraga atau pulut atau pun silat Melayu.
Let’s look of some of the early vibes following the lodgment of the Police Report on against several papers for publishing the commission before the report was made public.
- Lim Kit Siang – “The police report runs counter to the renewed pledge by PM for more open, accountable and transparent society including a Whistle Blowing Protection legislation……keeping abreast with international benchmarks” said LK Siang in his blog.
My comment: Who does this nyayok old shitter think he is? If he is open, accountable and transparencies, he should demand a full blow up of all the fiasco dealings of the 1st Family and extended Family. So brother, very clearly you can notice this old shitter and his band of Malaysian Malaysia sees only with one eye….the left one and I guess you know who or what I refer to. Dajal?
- Bar Council – “The police report is a blatant act of intimidation …..” said Bar Council Human Rights Committee Chairman.
My comment: Ekor dah keluar because of the Tun Salleh Abas case, the compensation payments and of cause the reforms to the Judiciary Appointment Committee. Kepala dah besak kut!
- Saifudin Nasution – in condemning the move to lodge the police report, the PKR Strategic Planning Director said “under the National Integrity Plan, media freedom was one of the seven points to promote integrity”;
My comment: Kepala otak dia, Media MSM dan Alternative Media ada banyak sangat integrity ke? Kalau ya, mengapa boss dia suroh boycott national papers? Hipokrite nombor 1.
- Guan Eng – “Review cases decided by Eusoff, Fairuz…..the focus of the probe should be mainly on Eusoff and Ahmad Firuz…”.
My comment: Ahhh…..this CM is an interested party since he was one of those affected by the decisions made by the judges. Under best practices, he should abstain himself from making any statements; someone else should have done it for him. But of course Malaysian Malaysia, they apply double standards to international best practices standards; just like the
- Lawyer for de facto PKR leader – “The former DPM would be seeking a review of all his court cases heard by the two former top judges”.
My comment: This is the conniving person who leaked the Lingam Video Tapes. Guess birds of a feather flock together – DSAI and Guan Eng. Really Guan Eng, you want to be closely associated with a sunk like the former DPM. See the latest idiotic act by the Chief Opposition Leader (probably acting on the advice of her husband) in accusing the government of corruption in the award of the submarine contract; she was told that her husband then had approved the deal. Guan Eng, jaga your integrity otherwise you would be infected unnecessary.
Should these cases be open for review, the opportunity rises to bring out new details of the past history of former DPM and these would be blown up again and in greater proportion under the guise of greater press freedom. I just hope his family can bear through the full circle again.
You would notice how concerned this gang bang is about on the police investigation. What are they afraid off - that the investigation gets out of hand and or the coarse of more freedom curtailed or are they protecting some one BIG? Or are they just afraid of nothing?
- TDM – “I'm Prepared To Be Investigated And Charged In Court”. “By charging me in court, I will have the opportunity to explain many things that the judges did, including lobbying". TDM hoped that investigations on him would not be stopped on grounds that there was no case. "In that case, I will have no opportunity to explain what had happened, but instead if I was charged, then I can explain what I had done and what others did including the judges with regard to lobbying. "I want to tell about the judges who had come to me to lobby. He said the decisions he made on the appointments, including that of judges, were based on his own assessment.
"My decision is based on my assessment. I don't care who lobbied or who spoke to me. If I decide that the individual concerned should be appointed, then I will appoint. If a person should not be appointed, even though he was recommended by the judge, I will not appoint.
"I am not a postman, when the chief judge recommends, I straight away approve and see the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the King endorses. If that is the case, it can be said the appointment of the chief judge is decided by the outgoing chief judge.
"Then, I don't have any role at all. I don't want to be a postman," he said. If lobbying is wrong, then these judges should be probed"
I need not say more except that TDM seemed all prepared to challenge the whole gang and others who may a hand in wanting to make his life a “little difficult”. Many people I know including non-Malays have very high respect for TDM and therefore the actions of those trying to demonise TDM will surely have a boomerang effect.
So my brother, have patience, let’s see how this intrigue develops as it still has a long way to go. The Police should cover all angles including finding out who have the motive in the release the Commission’s findings. Perhaps some interesting BIG names will come out from the investigation. .
No comments:
Post a Comment