My recent comments to Matthias Chang’s posting on ‘Tun Salleh Guilty or Not Guilty of Judicial Misconduct, The Royal “Omission” Much Ado about Nothing on Pak Lah and His Clowns & WAYANG KULIT’ as posted in the thirteen million plus ringgit guy rumbles, is as follows.
Syabas Matthias Chang, very well presented. Now the picture looks much, much clearer. There seems so much sin in the present Executive to feed the fires of hell that even the highest Fahrenheit in the thermostat cannot but burst into flames
I must admit I am not a lawyer; perhaps you can give some insight to the following questions/ comments:
- Can it be coordinated for Tan Sri Abu Talib, the former Attorney General who brought the charges against Tun Salleh upon a complaint from the Agong, Tun Hamid Omar, the former Lord President who succeeded Tun Salleh and presided at the Tribunal and former Prime Minister, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad to be present together to mount a rigorous rebuttal to all the misperceptions and insinuations that have been orchestrated against them over the years? If yes, then they should present themselves in front of a press conference with the local and international press media. If for one reason or other such as due to health reasons, then they just be present but the text of rebuttal be read by their representatives.
These disclosures and exposures should be blown big to serve a multiple of objectives amongst which to explain to the UMNO grassroots as well as to the public local and overseas the kind of evil leadership that is at the helm of the country and for the members of parliament to do nothing expected by their electorate. So UMNO members please heed the advice of TDM – leave the party as independents and come back to the fold when PM leaves office.
- Can this 3 persons or representatives of any citizen group file a suit against the Minister Zaid Ibrahim and the Prime Minister of Malaysia for willfully, maliciously and fraudulently attempting to misrepresent the public, the people of Malaysia on the Salleh Abas case and the misuse of public funds to serve their ill intended purposes as well as funding the dinner function and as justification of the ex-gratia payments or whatever legal grounds you as a lawyer knows best.
This would put to jam the Executive’s ill intended reforms until the truth prevails. The costs from this legal suit could be recouped from the Government coffers if the case is worthy to be won. This is on the assumption the Executive is not above the law and the purpose is amongst others to keep the public abreast that our judiciary system should not submit the kind of reforms initiated by ill intentions.
- What kind of sinister crookedness do we have in Tun Salleh who said that TDM orchestrated the events that led to his (Salleh’s) dismissal when documents proved otherwise? Where can Tun Salleh hide himself if he is god fearing after accepting the falsity of the gala dinner and accepting the ex-gratia payment? Semua dah bongkar; Zaid nak tipu siapa lagi? Resign Zaid, you are a sham to the country, race and religion!
- Waiting for the release of the 1st letter – let’s see the way the Lord President wrote the insolent letter to the Agong so that we can concur with the actions of the Agong.
I heard the 1st letter was like written by a ‘bangsawan’ to a peon; such disgrace for a person once at the pinnacle of our judiciary system. If the present Executive has shown much disregard and cannot work with the Rulers Council, I see no reason for withholding the release of the 1st letter provided Tun has met and got the consent of the said Agong then perhaps as good courtesy. Respect others and you will be respected, this present Executive fails to understand and his arrogance will be the key factor that will bring him down just as God had punished Iblis.
- Yes I totally agree “There cannot be an independent judiciary in
How do we now exhume the 20 year case again when the AG office has said it’s closed and no apology required? Perhaps with public pressure from 1 & 2 above, the AG office will reconsider reopening the case.
It’s a bit late; I have to wake up early tomorrow to send the kids to school. But for sure, I’ll give comments on the 2nd part of your discourse.
Bravo, brother, bravo.
Continuing from yesterday
The Wayang Kulit
- Many of us share the same views on PM’s game plan of “populist approach” in his reform policies etc with his end game in giving his family the much needed time to consolidate and buy over votes at the detriment of UMNO and the people.
Our common views will remain as convincing conspiracy theories in the alternative media and the MSM will be blocked from giving the required exposure.
The main target for your exposures remains with the voters, either for the UMNO election or the Silent Majority any forthcoming election or by-election and many of them may not be user friendly to the alternative media. Thus in identifying your various segments you may have to refine or simplify this complicated conspiracy in a reader friendly manner. Then dish out some hard copies for others to photocopy and distribute to others. This could be one effective way to communicate your assertions.
If you could be given say ½ hour to present your findings at important seminars like the Suntikan Semagat Satria on 31 May 2008 at Crown Plaza PJ would be lovely.
- Relationship between the Executive and Bar Council President – this is another conspiracy theory which maybe inadequate for any credible action to be brought by members of the Bar Council against her. Perhaps going through the by-laws of the Bar Council and rehashing with additional evidence with emphasis say regarding to the meeting that took place at the British High Commissioner’s official residence and at the Kuala Lumpur Bon Ton restaurant to fit the grounds for disciplinary action would put the woman off-balance. I am quite sure with sufficient focus the objective to penalize the chairwoman once and for all could be achieved, all done objectively in the best interest of the Bar Council and the country.
- The man who does it the back way. This much I can say, he is not liked by many including the Silent Majority. PM as UMNO president has indeed made a bad judgment. A detail profile of this legal bump together with the other nincompoops in the MT/ Cabinet and their various actions deemed detrimental to the party, nation and religion should be bared before members from the July branch meetings.
Be objective and not slanderous so as to guarantee the integrity of the write ups. The purpose is simple: Many of the public are not happy with the characters of the UMNO line up in the cabinet and having those shows the high handedness of PM in enhancing a team of yes men around him at the expense of public opinion. They include amongst others Mohamed son of Mohamed, the man who does it the back way, the minister in charge of religious affairs.
Perhaps you need to come together with the assistance of others who are familiar with these characters in coming out with such profiles. And oh yes, never, never forget the Prince of darkness. His ability to speak shallow on a number of issues in Parliament reflects his “illegal” exposure to these issues vis a vis the abuse of his position as the SIL of the PM. This is not the type of governance the country needs; it reflects bad governance in the eyes of the international media.
- The shortfalls in the Royal Commission on the Linggam Video Tapes have to be brought out to the public on an urgent basis. If you are indeed substantially correct in your conclusions and assertions, then the Executive indeed made a mockery out of our judiciary system which UMNO grassroots would never be receptive nor will the Silent Majority. Your punch line stays “The misconduct by the members of the Commission has aggravated the already tarnished image of the Malaysian judiciary”. The leadership continues to fail the country and its people and this has to be stopped abruptly.
No comments:
Post a Comment